Prescribe Ritalin to Everyone, Provocative Essay Suggests

Prescribe Ritalin to Everyone, Provocative Essay Suggests


ShareThis
If you could take a pill to boost your concentration and mental stamina, would you do it? Around the country, thousands of college students are already answering “yes” to that question and are using prescription medications like Ritalin as study aids, and researchers say the demand for such “smart pills” is likely to grow. Now, in a new essay, a group of neuroscientists and bioethicists is arguing that society shouldn’t frown on such practices; instead the authors assert that “we should welcome new methods of improving our brain function,” and that doing it with pills is no more morally objectionable than eating right or getting a good night’s sleep [Chronicle of Higher Education].
Stimulants like Ritalin and Adderall are prescribed for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and are commonly used by people without a prescription to help them focus their attention, while a narcolepsy drug called Provigil is sometimes used by people trying to keep their brains alert and awake. The new essay cited a recent survey that found nearly 7 percent of students in U.S. universities have used prescription stimulants, and on some campuses, as many as a quarter of students have used the drugs for non-therapeutic purposes. “It’s a felony, but it’s being done,” [coauthor Martha] Farah said [Reuters].
In the essay, published in Nature [subscription required], the authors argue that such usage is likely to become more routine over time. As more effective brain-boosting pills are developed, demand for them is likely to grow among middle-aged people who want youthful memory powers and multitasking workers who need to keep track of multiple demands, said one commentary author, brain scientist Martha Farah…. “Almost everybody is going to want to use it,” Farah said. “I would be the first in line if safe and effective drugs were developed that trumped caffeine,” [said] another author, Michael Gazzaniga [AP].
The authors say that scientists should begin to study the long-term effects of these drugs on healthy people, and investigate whether there’s a risk of addiction. And while the essay is generally supportive of what it calls mental “enhancements,” the authors do suggest two possible downsides to making pharmaceuticals like Ritalin widely available: children could feel coerced into taking the drugs either directly or through peer pressure, the authors say, and the expense of such drugs might limit their use to people with higher incomes, which could heighten social inequalities. Despite such attempts to balance benefits and risks, the commentary didn’t impress Leigh Turner of the University of Minnesota Center for Bioethics. “It’s a nice puff piece for selling medications for people who don’t have an illness of any kind,” Turner said [AP].
Related Content:
80beats: Herbal Remedy Doesn’t Help Kids With Attention Deficit Disorder
Image: flickr / thp365
December 8th, 2008 8:36 AM Tags: bioethics, drugs & addiction, health policy, learning, pharmaceuticals
by Eliza Strickland in Health & Medicine | 59 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >
59 Responses to “Prescribe Ritalin to Everyone, Provocative Essay Suggests”
Steve Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 9:51 am
This is shameful. The drug companies have outdone themselves.
Now children, students, and professionals will be virtually forced into taking these drugs in order to compete in the classroom, on campus, and in the workplace. Everyone will be compelled to take these drugs or risk failure in a competitive environment.
Oh yes, the drugs will be deemed “safe”. The drug companies will see to that.
How truly sad for humanity.
Baz Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 10:03 am
This is a dangerous medicine. I used my kid’s Ritalin. I was 50 years old and healthy. My pulse and blood pressure went up, and I had heart palpitations. Worst of all, it created changes in my personality: I became reckless and aggressive. I found it difficult to stop taking the medication until finally I realized how fully demented I was becoming. I stopped taking it, and took my child off of it as well. Don’t fool around with this stuff.
heya Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 10:25 am
We don’t allow steroids even though in some ways they enhance physical performance. Why ritalin?
Anonymous Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 10:27 am
Ritalin is death in small doses.
Bernhard J Hamaker Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 10:39 am
This is ridiculous. Ritalin won’t improve our level of happiness or civility–quite the opposite. I hope this article causes a stir. Nothing has stopped the pharma juggernaut yet, but I hope something will finally get them to stop their heinous monopoly on healing.
Dr J Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 10:41 am
Why not…at the rate we’re going, it will become mandatory for all US citizens to be on:
Statins, Flu Vaccines, Anti-Depressants, and drugs like Ritalin. Then comes the next generation of mind controlling drugs. I’m a retired M.D., who walked away from a thriving family practice because of the pharmaceutical insanity. I couldn’t look at myself in the mirror, because all I saw was a legalized drug pusher. To all my fellow doctors…treat the cause, not the symptom.
Winner takes all Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 10:41 am
Those who wine will be left behind
Norm Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 10:44 am
“It is by will alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the juice of sapho that thoughts acquire speed, the lips acquire stains, the stains become a warning. It is by will alone I set my mind in motion.” - Frank Herbert’s Dune (Movie version)
Are we really so far from this? None of these drugs are harmless, and very little is known about long-term use, less is known about potential interactions with other drugs (prescribed and otherwise). This is nothing more than pharmaceutical companies again trying to boost income at the expense of the consumer, using advertising as an end-run around competent medical advice.
Beaker Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 10:45 am
This suggestion is irresponsible and shows an appalling lack of knowledge of the history of stimulant abuse. Here we go again. Japan in the 1950s. USA diet pills in the 1960s. And now adult ADHD drugs in the 21st century. Experience has shown us that, when it comes to cognition, you cannot get something for nothing. Stimulants temporarily allow cognitive enhancement at the expense of the later crash and also chronic breakdown of normal homeostasis. Drs Greely and Sahaklan may think they are being “provocative.” but people will be hurt in the long run by their very bad ideas.
Martha W. Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 10:46 am
You write: “a group of neuroscientists and bioethicists is arguing that society shouldn’t frown on such practices;”.
Bioethicists? Sounds like they are just self appointed “deciders” about what is right and what is wrong - their judgment is so out of whack with what any responsible person would recognize: That pushing the body with drugs, unless one is physically sick and needs a drug to prevent the worsening of an illness, is neither healthy nor desirable.
These so-called bioethicists are so out of touch with reality that they deny the harmful effect that drugs like Ritalin and so many other mood and mind altering drugs can and do have on the body. Don’t they even care that the use of any of these drugs involves serious risk factors due the many side effects on the body and brain? And they call themselves “bioethicists”? What a travesty.
As poster Steve says, these drug companies have really outdone themselves. Their marketing techniques have probably exceeded their wildest imaginations in how they have twisted the minds of even the “professionals”. Well done.
What idiocy.
Brian Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 10:48 am
Wow. Nearly speechless but I’ll try… America doesn’t have enough problems, let’s take all the money we don’t have and spend it on the pharmaceutical equivalent of cocaine!!! I guess this is the form the Pharma bailout takes - hooking everyone on an addictive stimulant in the name of competition.
Won’t be much of a competition for long when all the CIA shipped coke makes it into the hands of millions of eager Americans who find Ritalin no longer gives them the edge it once did in nursery school.
What happened to America??? Did the government finally tune the bozo rays just right and turn them all into stammering goblins?
MC Deala Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 10:48 am
Ritalin is a gateway drug for cocaine and other methanphetamines. It also happens to be addictive, as many college students are finding out. Selling additive drugs seems to be a popular trend, both legal and otherwise.
jhn Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 10:48 am
If the drugs truly are safe, what exactly is wrong with everyone taking them?
Brian Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 10:52 am
Woops almost forgot - here is another prime example of corporations getting news published to influence the masses - their obviously self-serving studies - and headlines meant to invoke a sense of inadequacy and urgency - condoning behavior that is neither beneficial to us as individuals or us as a free nation. I suggest everyone try to check out Alex Jones’ infowars website.
I used to think he was crazy, but the headlines on his website are actually making more sense now than “Let’s all take Ritalin!!!” My God.
jhn Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 10:52 am
@Beaker
There is no scientific basis to your claim that “all” stimulants must give you a temporary rise in functioning followed by a “crash.” That’s folk science.
Posters, stop dressing up your morality as science, and put down your coffee.
Jeff Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 10:57 am
I agree 100% with Steve and others. It is irrelevant whether it is safe and non-addictive. Just like with steroids for athletes, if these brain-boosting drugs are made legal, then all students and professionals will be required to use them to remain competitive. Allowing them will be the same as requiring them. At least if you legalize safe, recreational drugs such as marijuana, I will still have the choice not to take them.
JT Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 11:03 am
jhn, first off, they can and do always lie about drug safety, or campaign promises, or WMD’s - that’s what corporations and governments do - that’s how they got in power in the first place - through their cunning and our ignorance.
I bet you are still waiting for those WMD’s to show up? Drug companies and the doctors and journals they co-op will say anything to make a profit - its been proven time and time again. Also its a matter of physics and biology, you can’t just increase your energy and not somehow pay for it another way.
Coffee, cigs, booze, it all affects you, Ritalin is much stronger, and even comparable to cocaine in many ways. Go look it up for yourself people. Don’t be like jhn there and just take everything for face value. This is reality and in reality its the survival of the fittest, no one is looking out for you except yourself.
End the WoD Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 11:08 am
I think that if people find these drugs helpful they should be free to use them. That said, we’ve been around this block before with amphetamines in the sixties, which led to the mantra, “Speed kills.” Dopamine agonists like Ritalin are habituating when used chronically. The body adjusts to the drug. The same is true of benzodiazepines like Xanax and Valium for anxiety. The real problem is that we have created an economy and a society that is mercilessly exploitive and is not good for human beings in the name of “productivity” and profit. There is nothing wrong with most otherwise healthy people taking Ritalin or an amphetamine to stay alert for some short term task, just like drinking coffee, but regular use of these medications leads to serious side effects and ceases to have the desired effect without constantly increasing doses. Indeed, chronic use of amphetamines or cocaine (another dopamine agonist) can cause a syndrome which clinically resembles paranoid schizophrenia. Read Nikki Sixx’s book, “The Heroin Diaries.” Or Maureen McCormick AKA Marcia Brady. Do you really want to spend the rest of your life hiding in the bedroom closet with a gun?
Daniel. Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 11:08 am
Caffeine, cocaine anyone?
Gene Poole Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 11:09 am
Ritalin? No.
But if we approve (collectively) freedom, Big Pharma will indeed be motivated to produce ‘brain drugs’ which are safe in short and long run.
In the current social atmosphere, seeking of enhancement is confession of weakness. But so what? Everyone is weak in some way; yet, we are told to suck it up and slog on.
Nonetheless, slaves of the system need whatever support possible. Best to make it a sustainable sort, yes? Free Pharma to help us, safely and non-addictively. Why not?
Terryeo Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 11:14 am
RESULTS. If I tell you that swinging a dead cat around in the light of the full moon makes you smarter, will you believe me? Why then would you believe pill pushers whose sole intent is selling more pills? RESULTS. Let those who wish to profit demonstrate RESULTS.
d westwolf Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 11:17 am
Mother Nature is thinking “How cute, ll only human”
So I Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 11:22 am
Sure, just give me my first fix for free … that’s how you expand your customer base.
I believe everything the government says, they would never allow drug companies to give us something unless it was good for us. Just like all those people that poo-poo fluoride, chlorine, endocrine disrupting plastics, GMO in the food they don’t even label as such unless there is 5% or more, so on and so on - it’s all good for you so just shut up and eat it.
So what if cancer rates are increasing, autism is off the charts, and fertility rates are dropping. Too many people on earth anyway. I would gladly give up my seat so the social elite (not you or you or even you) and their offspring can enjoy a much less crowed earth. Who’s with me?
me2098 Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 11:29 am
my son was on ridilin for 5 years,he would walk right by a strawberry shortcake,no appitite,underweight,stomach ache,headache,ext,ext,ridilin has caused some scary times in our family like the time,just after my son had been off ridilin for awhile,he and i get into argument he takes butcher knife and threatens to kill himself with ,not good,not even in his nature and there’s much more but it would take to long,as for giving ridilin to everyone that shouldn’t be to hard for the drug companies,as even the kids that are basically forced to use ridilin,don’t get a real diagnose,anyway ,you go to the doc cause the teacher ,or school requests it,the doc looks at you basiclly and says oh yes you have it,no blood tests nothing. very bad stuff,thank god my son has turned into a very fine young man,i hate to think about what he would be like if he was still takin ridilin.all these pharma mind drugs are very dangerous period!!!
Derrick Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 11:31 am
I’ll be the first to admit that I cannot put down my coffee. And I will also admit that we have to be careful of baseless generalizations. However, what scientific basis do we have that Ritalin is safe anyone — especially for those without ADHD?
A doctor prescribed to me an anti-biotic for a sinus infection once. After two days, I became depressed. On the third say, I almost took a knife out of my kitchen drawer and stabbed myself in the chest! Until then, I had never been deeply depressed a day in my life — let alone suicidal! A small beacon of reason gave me strength to put down the knife and research the medicine I was taking. Funny, I didn’t find any “proof” that my anti-biotic was the cause. But, I knew something was wrong. I wasn’t behaving as myself.
I skipped the next dose and found myself manic for a few days. I had rebounded from skipping my dose. I went to my doctor and described everything. Her response: “yeah, that anti-biotic will do that some times. You don’t need to finish taking it”.
Keep in mind, even scientists have pushed their flawed reasoning dressed in science for whatever reason. Everyone is susceptible to the flaw of mistaking illogic for reason. The sword of reason cuts both ways.
Damian Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 11:54 am
“I agree 100% with Steve and others. It is irrelevant whether it is safe and non-addictive. Just like with steroids for athletes, if these brain-boosting drugs are made legal, then all students and professionals will be required to use them to remain competitive. Allowing them will be the same as requiring them. At least if you legalize safe, recreational drugs such as marijuana, I will still have the choice not to take them.”
I don’t see any basis for your assertion at all. Alcohol is legal, and alcohol helps you pick up a member of the opposite sex, but it’s hardly necessary to do so. Legalizing alcohol has not made it “required”. Legalizing diet pills has not made them “required” to lose weight. Legalizing aspirin has not made it “required” to deal with pain. Computers aren’t “required” to write a great essay, though they make it vastly easier. And on and on. You could have made the exact same argument to justify banning ANYTHING that humans have invented to make their lives easier: “It’s going to make life unfair for those who choose not to embrace this new technology.”
Hardly. Anyone who doesn’t want to drug themselves can use the old time-tested methods of maintaining concentration. Meditation. Exercise. Mozart. Whatever. Does coffee give some workers a competitive edge? Should it therefore be banned? Is it “required” to be successful?
Look, I can distill all of these arguments down to one: Does anyone on this message board reserve the moral right to tell someone else what they can put in their bodies, if they hurt no one but themselves in doing so?
If you answer “yes”, then why can’t WE tell YOU what to put in your body, via moral equivalence? Would you be willing to give up caffeine, alcohol, birth control pills, aspirin, cigarettes, trans fats, Whoppers, and afternoons in the cancer-causing sun, simply because some external agency–the government, Christian Scientists, a doctor–declared that they had the right to dictate the operation of your body? If not, why do YOU have the right to tell other people how to live, and not those groups? What makes you the universal font of personal choice?
If you answer “no”, then lay off already. Nobody should be required to take Ritalin or anything else, but if an adult thinks it helps, let him or her decide whether it’s worth the risk. If he jumps in a car and crashes it on Ritalin, charge him with reckless endangerment, just like you would if he crashed it on legal alcohol, a legal cell phone, or legal sleep deprivation. You can’t legislate the world into perfect safety; you can only ensure justice for those who behave irresponsibly.
Any attempt to mix a “yes” and “no” strays quickly into base hypocrisy: “Ok, all the things people like to take should be legal except for Ritalin because…” It’s a losing argument. If you don’t want the drug companies to get your money, DON’T BUY THEIR DRUGS. It’s actually your choice.
Damian Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 12:03 pm
PS: Eliza, I must say that your choice of headline here is poor. The essay says “a proper societal response will involve making enhancements available while managing their risks”, while your headline implies that the essay recommends compulsory use of the drugs. It’s a vast difference, and a source of at least some of the outrage in these comments. “Make Ritalin available to everyone” would have been more consistent with the authors’ intent.
me2098 Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 12:05 pm
i personally think its all about making more money, without having the costs of inventing safe new drugs, if science says that speed and coke are good for you then i guess they must be right,cause they said so,who they heck are they anyway!!!lots of hits on the net about ridilin and other mind drugs and suicide
Beaker Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 1:02 pm
@jhn
I’m all for discussing each drug class on its own merits–and I accept your point that “all” stimulants may not lead to a crash. I was thinking specifically about amphetamines and methylphenidate–because the discussion was about drugs used for ADHD. If you read the essay in Nature, you see a big picture of Adderall right there on the first page, and and most of the essay discusses amphamines. Giving healthy people amphetamines for cognition enhancement (or weight loss) is a bad idea, full stop. Perhaps the same is not true for modafinil or galantamine or caffeine.
The rest of the rambling essay outlines some general principles and ideals about cognition enhancement. There is much psychobabble and almost no discussion of pharmacology. For that reason, it’s irresponsibly written.
badluckartist Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 1:09 pm
Wow I only had to skim through the posts for a few seconds to see everything from people comparing Ritalin to cocaine and athletic steroids to claiming that it’s “all about the money”.
First, the easier one- everything in America is about money. EVERYTHING. If you come from a background of not having much, you should know this first hand. If you don’t, then you can shut the hell up, at least about that.
Second, to all the people comparing amphetamines and amphetamine-like drugs to anabolic steroids and cocaine, get your shit straight and do some research before you go mouthing off about what’s right and wrong. Getting drawn into social stigma about how ‘drugs are evil’ is ignorant and close-minded. Everything about our culture is artificial and laced with all kinds of fun chemicals for which we aren’t entirely sure of the side-effects. The point I’m making isn’t to troll, but to be pissed off at people not knowing their facts, and having an opinion on something they know little about.
I’ve done a lot of drugs in my time. I am a freshman college student. I know plenty of people who do, and who don’t use drugs ‘illicitly’. It’s a matter of personal preference and knowing how to use them correctly. Letting your body dive into a state of dependency- unintelligent. The 50 year old guy that started taking his kid’s Ritalin and suddenly discovered that it could cause heart palpatations… for a lack of kinder words, shouldn’t be reproducing.
It isn’t the drug that causes mental disorders, it’s the user that doesn’t know how to use them correctly. The higher the risk, the higher the level of understanding and restraint THE USER has to have. Some drugs simply aren’t worth the risk (heroin), and some are more than worth the risk (amphetamines and similar drugs).
badluckartist Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 1:12 pm
I haven’t read the essay and am in no way sticking up for it, as an aside here. My post is mostly a hotheaded (though rightfully so) response to the x number of posts I read through.
badluckartist Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 1:15 pm
Also, Damian’s response kind of owns mine both in terms of accuracy and vicious punctuality. Kudos.
Amos Kenigsberg (Discover Web Editor) Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 2:16 pm
I like the unintentional profundity of Winner Takes All’s comment: “Those who wine will be left behind.”
Larian LeQuella Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 2:38 pm
Darn it Amos, I’m getting left behind then. You can have my Cabernet when you pry it from my dead, cold fingers!
Amos Kenigsberg (Discover Web Editor) Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 3:24 pm
But with all that resveratrol coursing through your veins, who knows when that’ll be…
Mike MacArthur Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 5:33 pm
Start at the start: there is very little real evidence supporting the use of Ritalin at all, for anybody. The difference between it and the placebo sugar pill is so small, why not just require us all to take the sugar pill to be..um…to be…smarter? In Lucas’ THX1138 the workers are all drug tested…to make sure they are taking their “concentration-enhancing” pills.
Maybe we could come up with a Ritalin-Viagra “cocktail” for people who need neither. They would be forced to concentrate on their partner’s pleasure while having the fortitude to deliver same.
Damian Says:
December 8th, 2008 at 8:36 pm
PPS: Quite a comment turn out! Controversy sells.
dano Says:
December 9th, 2008 at 12:04 am
Altering brain chemicals will have devastating effects. The consequences will be passed on genitally to future generations having irreversible effects. The human brain is way to complicated for us to be tampering with it via synthetics. Think about it why do some need psychological drugs and some not, were all the same.
TW Says:
December 9th, 2008 at 11:01 am
Boy! the DUMBING DOWN of America has even reached new heights.
nick Says:
December 9th, 2008 at 11:36 am
how much did the drug companies pay these guys to write this?
Matt Says:
December 9th, 2008 at 12:57 pm
I think the governments of the world should prescribe us drugs not only to make us alert but allow us the great ability of not having to sleep so we can work not only more productively but longer for our beloved employers. Then we could ask those nice big pharma companies to make drugs that keep us happy all the time too like soma. Eventually we might even develop drugs that make us prettier, smarter and stronger. Im all for it…..
badnicolez Says:
December 10th, 2008 at 12:02 pm
It’s only a (short) matter of time before the poor/minorities who can’t afford these drugs sue government/big pharma claiming a violation of their civil rights due to evil rich people taking drugs that make them more alert and productive, thus creating an unfair competetive environment.
Then we’re subsidizing legal AND illegal drugs for the poor.
That’s it, I’ll buy stock in big pharma now while it’s cheap so I can afford the taxes to pay for all these new entitlements!
Suzy Says:
December 10th, 2008 at 12:50 pm
Dont you see it, if the drug is made available to the public,It is not much different than alcohal sale and consumption. The mental effect is much more productive and the bad side effects are no worse. Yes two wrongs do not make a right - but I bet you will bennifit from other people using the drug for the right resons. The only use of alchohal that might be good is what red wine in small doses does for your digestive track. Ritalin could assist the birth of new ideas - inventions - creations - progress - I expect I am going to read the oposition to this message. IF OUR ADULTS WERE the informed public instead of the ignorant public we would have evolved past - they kind of person who is laughing over my bad spelling, instead of thinking for a miniute. Thank you for your time !
Chris Says:
December 11th, 2008 at 1:48 am
I feel that we should attempt to enhance ourselves as much as possible. Let it be an individual decision or whatever.
Hitting a wall of ones own limitations is not fun, I would use and support performance enhancers. However use and abuse of these powerful medications does come with some risk.
It also comes down to a matter or inevitability. If performance enhancing drugs and therapies exist, somebody is going to use them. If somebody is using them, everyone else is at a disadvantage.
It is funny, that we as a society have grown beyond basic genetic evolution, as our current society could be remarked as, “Survival of the prettiest.”
Chris Says:
December 11th, 2008 at 1:56 am
dano Says:
December 9th, 2008 at 12:04 am
“Altering brain chemicals will have devastating effects. The consequences will be passed on genitally to future generations having irreversible effects. The human brain is way to complicated for us to be tampering with it via synthetics. Think about it why do some need psychological drugs and some not, were all the same.”
Dano, using prescription medication in general does not create a genetic change in an individual.
As I know there are 2 ways for a medication to effect genitics. The first is for the medicine to be a virus, created to cause a specific change in the genetic coding of a cell. The other is to damage the DNA within the cell, because of the bodies own defense mechanisms, cells with damaged DNA a usually destroyed.
Jody Blond Says:
December 11th, 2008 at 4:07 pm
I have taken Ritalin for almost 15 years. It has improved my functioning and has not harmed my health. I don’t abuse it, I take it as prescribed. I am still creative, but can organize, plan, and maintain focus. Our own military has done research into the effects of stimulants to enhance performance. And have you not read that the cup of coffee in mid-afternoon makes you smarter? Perhaps the person that wrote of the crazed response to his child’s Ritalin simply didn’t need the drug or took the incorrect dose. Ritalin is not indicated for use by many people, i.e. those with psychiatric or heart problems…dad, don’t take your son’s drugs! Also, it isn’t recommended to just give a drug with out also counseling in the areas of social skills, and educational and psychological issues. It’s a mild stimulant. Not everyone can or should take it. I think the gist of the article was that we should research the idea of improving our brains further. Science fiction has covered the idea of us all being ‘perfect’. Choice and education for all! Also, I am an educator and have never advocated for drugs for children under ten. When I have asked parents to talk with their doctors and have their child evaluated, I have also suggested that they try the drug for a few weeks and ask the child if it is working; they know. Imagine if Albert Einstein’s parents had put him on stimulants so that he would succeed in school rather than home schooling him? He may have worked his entire life filing patents. What a lost that would have been. !
john Says:
December 11th, 2008 at 10:16 pm
anyone ever look at the original uses for ritalin? better still where are the documents that the axis and allied armies medical corp agencies assembled before during and after the second world war, the korean conflict and just about every military engagement which has occured for the past fifty years?
the issue of genetics being influenced by short or long term use has another name usually it is, smokescreen.
ever wondered the reason people of the high arctic or persons living within 200 miles south of northern russia’s coastal regions rarely if ever experience or report experiencing a.d.h.d. or maladies the compound is used to “treat”? should you be able to obtin a copy of the tome readers may find its internationally documented provides the answer might be in dr. cosmas ho’s texts. unfortunately it looks like the book will NEVER be available via regular purchase processes to Americans having the condition or to American readers having a intrest in learning disability. the closest to it is contained in dr.daniel amens healing the seven types of a.d.d.. i guess that by this time next year the subject of his essays will itself no longer be available to the world, as a nauturally occuring substance or since it cannot be patented a synthesized one.
john
Gehmaxx Says:
December 14th, 2008 at 12:09 pm
It sucks people are using this for recreation yes, but keep in mind the people that it helps. People lack in dopamine or whatever, the people who are anxious and scared to go out in public and can’t focus on anything. Fact is, it does help people. Hate on the people , not the drug.
Gehmaxx Says:
December 14th, 2008 at 12:11 pm
And for you who say it slowly kills you. Personally I would rather slowly kill myself on this drug and live a life with confidence and people in it. Than to not have this drug and live a life of solitary , fear, suicidal thoughts.
bob dobbs Says:
December 14th, 2008 at 6:19 pm
Wow, a ton of the commentators here are Scientologists, they don’t really care about Ritalin, they
just use it to demonize mental health professionals and scare their acolytes away from them. Scientology does not want it’s followers to even engage in talk therapy with a psychiatrist. L Ron
Hubbard concoted his “History of Man” by feeding his son Benzedrine, an amphetamine like Ritalin, and writings his drug ramblings down.
todd Says:
December 16th, 2008 at 7:59 pm
i dont know about the rest of you, but i wish i didnt need any medications in daily life, unfortunately i do. i think pple that arent experiencing problems and needing medication should leave well enough alone. exercise more, eat right and many of these pple looking to these meds without needing them would probably see some natural increases in energy and stamina. but pple will use them, usually the ones with money to spare, all seeking an easier way to enhance oneself.
mamabear Says:
December 17th, 2008 at 12:51 am
Happy to hear the last few comments. I am about to start an adhd med. Although I’m not sure what I’ll be perscribed, I am very optimistic that it will help me. I’ve been on anti-D’s for years with no real results. Just recently I’ve been consistantly seeing a counselor who had given me a series of tests never mentioning the idea of adhd, he just wanted to see if his hunch was right. I scored very high on the guidelines for adhd and when he first mentioned it I told him that I thought it was a disorder of hyper people. After I learned more about it it, I was shocked at how many things started to add up. I could care less what people think of me 4 trying a new medication, if it is ritalin or anything else. OF COURSE if you don’t have adhd it’s going to mess you up. From what I hear, the people who really have adhd are highly unlikely to become addicted and the benefits far exceed any side affects. I completetly relate to some of the comments above about being a recluse and inadequate. I swear to you, I have done everything I can to break myself of these things. If this helps, MORE POWER TO ME and more relief for the people who care about me. I do understand the hatred for the drug companies, I have it too. I am however, a big supporter of science and the benefit modern medicine.
sean Says:
January 14th, 2009 at 9:58 pm
They put caffeine in your Pepsi and Coke folks. Not much difference.
Mr. Mojo Risin Says:
February 5th, 2009 at 10:44 am
Did anyone notice the citation in the first paragraph? I agree with you all when you blame corporations or big pharma for this pill taking frenzy that’s gripped the U.S. in the past 15-20 years, but it was the Chronicle of Education that published the essay.
Teachers love doping children because that makes their job easier. When children are docile and complacent, teachers are happy.
At the risk of insulting our nation’s educators, I have to say the obvious. Teachers are more concerned with crowd control rather than education. It’s not really their fault. In my state the state dept. of education’s curriculum is so antiquated, that it’s a no brainer why little suzy or johnny needs ritalin and adderall to pay attention to crap like the Scarlet Letter. Reading Hawthorne will influence a whole generation of kids that reading sucks. There’s more up-to-date literature that has the same themes. Education in general also convinces people that they can’t do anything without a diploma or degree. That’s largely true, but there are cases where people pursued their non-academic talent to great success.
Education is about conformity and drugs aid in that endeavor. I blame the education cartel in this country for its acquiescence to Big Pharma.
Kate Says:
February 5th, 2009 at 12:38 pm
A society of drugged individuals?! This is so defiant of common sense. This country needs to wake up to the legalized drug-pushing that is going on: doctors, parents, students, young adults…There are subtle and severe effects to ingesting poisons, which is what these drugs are. Just by virtue of being synthetic, they are going to have a destructive effect on the body. That is the lesser worry, though. What these drugs do the minds, emotions and integrity of people is far worse.
Katharine Says:
February 5th, 2009 at 12:57 pm
Bio-what? I thought it said “ethicists.” Taking drugs is no different morally than eating healthily or getting a good night’s sleep? Are these people in earnest? Difficult not to suspect that they have been studying the effects of long-term drug use on themselves.
Steve Says:
February 7th, 2009 at 2:57 pm
As a healthcare professional I have considerable experience with the use of these agents–the upsides and the downsides. These medications are regulated for good reason; the mechanism of action in this class of medication that makes them so useful in certain patient populations also make these agents subject to misuse and abuse. I am sure folks are familiar with methamphetamine. The prescription stimulants are in the same class and each can be misused in the same way methamphetamine is. One could split hairs about slight differences between these agents, however, the bottom line is all of these agents if taken in high enough doses will result in the same effect. And, all are subject to dose escalation and the attendant effects on one’s daily activities of living, aka dependence. The authors make a comparison between these agents and a good night’s sleep and healthy diet. Hmm- does good sleep hygiene and a proper diet lead to the behavioral effects seen with stimulant dependence? I think not! I would certainly like to have a safe cognitive enhancing medication available. Unfortunately we’re not there yet.
Annmomoffour Says:
February 8th, 2009 at 8:48 pm
I love adderall and think everyone should take it , this world would be a whole lot better .
LovingTruth! Says:
March 8th, 2009 at 9:52 am
Let’s get on with the dumbing down of this world!

Leave a Reply
Name (required)
Mail (will not be published) (required)
Website

Labels: Prescribe Ritalin to Everyone, Provocative Essay Suggests

posted by Robert Heard at 11:29 AM